Recent Product Recalls Show Why Companies Must Prioritize Safety – and How Langino Law Holds Them Accountable
By Adam J. Langino, Esq.
Introduction
In late October and early November 2025, U.S. regulators announced a wave of product recalls involving toys, baby gear, and other children’s items. Each recall highlights a serious safety failure by a manufacturer, underscoring the importance of corporate accountability in consumer product safety. Below, we break down eight recent recalls – explaining what went wrong, what the companies should have done to prevent these dangers, and what consumers can do if they own the products or have been affected. We also provide tips for anyone injured by a defective product and explain why Langino Law is well equipped to help victims of unsafe products in Chapel Hill and across North Carolina. Our firm is dedicated to working hard to hold companies accountable, and we take pride in protecting our community.
Recent Recalls and Safety Failures (Oct–Nov 2025)
Each of the following recalls was announced in late October or early November 2025 by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). We describe the hazard involved, what happened, what the company should have done, and what consumers should do now.
Inkari Plush Alpaca Toys (Choking Hazard):
What Happened: Inkari B.V. recalled about 64,000 plush alpaca toy animals because the plastic eyes can detach, creating a small part that poses a choking hazard for young children. These wool alpaca toys were marketed for toddlers under 3, but the detachable eyes violate the federal small parts safety ban for that age group. (In toys for children under three, no component can come off that fits in a choke test cylinder.) Fortunately, no injuries or choking incidents had been reported at the time of the recall.
What Should Have Been Done: The manufacturer should have designed and tested the toys to eliminate small parts that could come loose. For any toy intended for toddlers, features like eyes should be either securely attached beyond all foreseeable use or embroidered/fabricated in a way that nothing can break off. Rigorous quality control and compliance testing before sale would have flagged this issue: pull tests on the eyes would have revealed a weakness. Inkari needed to ensure the eyes were either glued and anchored to withstand chewing and tugging, or replaced them with stitched eyes (no hard part at all). By following the CPSC’s small-parts standard during development, the company could have prevented this hazard and the recall in the first place.
Consumer Action: Immediately stop use of these plush alpaca toys. Inkari is offering a full refund. According to the recall instructions, consumers should cut off a portion of the toy’s fur, photograph it, and email the photo to the company as proof of destruction to receive the refund. If you have one of these toys, keep it away from children and contact Inkari through their recall page or customer service for the refund process.
Vevor Baby Swings (Infant Suffocation Hazard):
What Happened: Sanven Technology recalled about 1,020 Vevor Baby Swings because they were marketed for infant sleep while having an incline greater than 10 degrees. This design violates the mandatory federal safety standard for Infant Sleep Products and also violates the ban on inclined sleepers established by the Safe Sleep for Babies Act. An inclined sleeping surface can cause an infant’s head to slump forward, blocking their airway. The CPSC warned that using these swings for sleep poses a risk of suffocation. No injuries had been reported yet, but the hazard was deemed potentially deadly. The recalled swings (white/gray or black/gray models labeled “Multi-Function Electric Swing”) were sold online earlier in 2025.
What Should Have Been Done: The company should never have advertised or sold this inclined swing as suitable for infant sleep. To prevent this, they either needed to redesign the product to have a safe, flat sleeping angle (≤10°) or strictly market it only as a soothing swing for supervised awake time. Before going to market, the product should have been evaluated for compliance with infant sleep safety regulations. Adhering to the well-publicized safe sleep guidelines (flat surface, no incline) would have made it obvious that the swing in its current form was unsafe for sleep. If the inclined design was kept, the swing should have come with clear warnings against using it for sleep. In short, by following federal law and safe sleep standards during product development, Sanven could have avoided producing a hazardous product.
Consumer Action: Stop using the swing immediately, for any purpose. Even if your baby seems comfortable, do not use it – especially not for sleep. Sanven (through the Vevor brand) is offering a full refund. The recall notice instructs consumers to remove the swing’s fabric cover, cut the cover in half, and mark “Recalled” on the frame, then send a photo to the company to prove it’s destroyed before disposing of it. If you own this swing, follow those steps and contact the company (via their website or the email/phone provided in the recall) to get your refund.
WYBITNY Children’s Bed Rails (Entrapment Hazard):
What Happened: WYBITNY (Shanghai Siwu Jidan Shangmao Youxian Gongsi) recalled about 120 units of a portable children’s bed rail sold on Amazon. The bed rail failed to meet the federal safety standard for portable bed rails, because when it’s installed on a bed, dangerous gaps or openings can occur. A young child could become entrapped in a gap between the mattress and the rail, or in openings within the rail, leading to suffocation or strangulation. Additionally, the rails lacked required safety warning labels. No injuries had been reported, but the potential risk for serious injury or death prompted a fast recall.
What Should Have Been Done: The company should have designed the bed rail to comply fully with ASTM/CPSC safety standards for portable bed rails. This means eliminating any gaps where a child’s body or head could get trapped. Proper design and testing would include using straps or anchors to secure the rail firmly against the mattress, and ensuring any openings in the rail are too small for a head or torso. Before selling, WYBITNY needed to test the rail on various mattress sizes to ensure there were no dangerous gaps, and also include the mandatory warning labels and instructions. By performing thorough safety engineering and following the child bed rail standard, the manufacturer would have recognized the entrapment hazard and fixed the design (or not sold the product at all) beforehand.
Consumer Action: Discontinue use immediately. If you installed this bed rail on your child’s bed, remove it. WYBITNY is offering a full refund; consumers are typically asked to destroy the fabric part (or mark the rail as “Recalled”) and provide a photo to the company to get the refund. Refer to the recall notice for exact instructions (contact WYBITNY via email). Until the rail is removed, do not allow any child to sleep in a bed with it installed, as no DIY fix can make it safe.
Umeyda Children’s Nightgowns (Burn Hazard):
What Happened: Umeyda Company (distributed by StreamBytes LLC) recalled about 200 sets of children’s 100% cotton nightgowns because they failed to meet federal flammability standards for kids’ sleepwear. Under U.S. law, children’s sleepwear must be flame-resistant or snug-fitting. These nightgowns were loose-fitting cotton garments that could catch fire easily, posing a risk of burns to children. They were sold on Amazon (June–Oct 2025). No burn injuries had been reported, but selling non-compliant sleepwear creates the potential for severe injury, so the recall was initiated.
What Should Have Been Done: The manufacturer or distributor should have ensured the sleepwear met flammability safety requirements before sale. This could be achieved by using flame-resistant fabric or treating the material with a flame retardant, or by altering the design to be tight-fitting (e.g., snug pajama sets) so they are safer if exposed to flames. In this case, Umeyda produced loose, flowing nightgowns out of regular cotton – comfortable, but not flame-resistant. Proper testing under 16 CFR 1615/1616 (children’s sleepwear flammability standards) would have revealed that the fabric failed to self-extinguish or slow-burn as required. The company then should have either redesigned the product or not marketed it as sleepwear. Essentially, compliance testing and design adjustments (making them snug or using safer fabric) before listing the product would have prevented this recall entirely.
Consumer Action: Take these nightgowns away from children immediately. Do not let a child continue to wear them, even as play clothes, since the flammability risk remains. Umeyda is offering a full refund – per the recall, customers should cut the garments in half and send a photo of the destroyed nightgowns to the company as proof, then dispose of them. If you purchased these, follow the recall instructions to get your money back. In general, always be cautious with children’s sleepwear that seems very loose or made of untreated cotton; it may not meet safety standards.
Napei Infant Bath Tubs (Button Battery Ingestion Hazard):
What Happened: Sefon Store (an Amazon seller) recalled about 7,800 Napei Collapsible Infant Bath Tubs with Thermometer because the built-in thermometer’s button battery compartment is not secure. This means a baby or toddler could access the small battery, which is a serious ingestion hazard. If a button battery is swallowed, it can cause life-threatening internal burns within hours. The design of this bath tub violated the newly passed safety requirements (Reese’s Law) for battery-operated products, which mandate child-resistant battery compartments. No incidents of ingestion had been reported yet, but given the well-documented danger of button batteries, the recall was announced proactively.
What Should Have Been Done: The product should have been designed from the start with a child-proof battery compartment. U.S. safety standards (effective in 2023 under Reese’s Law) require that button cell batteries in consumer products be secured—typically with a screw-on panel or a two-step latch that young kids can’t open. Napei’s manufacturer needed to incorporate these features. Proper safety review would have immediately flagged an easily opened battery cover as unacceptable. Additionally, the company should have done use-case testing, imagining how a curious toddler might interact with the tub and thermometer. By complying with the button battery safety regulation during design and production, Sefon could have prevented this hazardous product from reaching the market. In other words, a simple fix like a tiny screw to lock the battery cover would have averted the entire problem.
Consumer Action: Stop using the infant tub’s thermometer feature at once (and ideally stop using the tub altogether until fixed). Sefon Store is providing a free repair kit that will secure the battery compartment to those who purchased the tub. If you own this product, contact the company as directed in the recall (there’s usually an email like Napei’s customer service) to request the repair kit. Until the fix is applied, do not use the tub, and certainly keep it out of reach of children so they can’t fiddle with the battery cover. Always be extremely cautious with any household item containing a button battery: ensure battery doors are taped shut or secured if there’s any doubt.
Konges Sløjd 3-Wheeled Scooters (Fall and Injury Hazard):
What Happened: Konges Sløjd (of Denmark) recalled approximately 50 three-wheeled children’s scooters. The issue was that the front wheel can detach during use, causing the rider to lose balance and crash. The company received 18 reports of the left front wheel coming off. In at least 3 cases, children were injured – one broke an arm, another lost a tooth, and a third had a bad fall leading to cuts and bruises. These scooters (with “cherry” and “lemon” patterns on the deck) were sold online and were intended for young children. A sudden wheel detachment is clearly a serious defect that can lead to traumatic falls.
What Should Have Been Done: The manufacturer should have conducted extensive durability and safety testing on the scooter, especially the wheel assembly. A children’s scooter needs to withstand bumps, turns, and regular rough play without coming apart. The wheel attaching mechanism (likely an axle bolt or similar) appears to have been insufficient. To prevent this, Konges Sløjd needed to stress-test prototypes – for example, riding them over rough terrain, repeatedly turning and going off small curbs – to see if any parts loosen. If a wheel ever loosened in testing, the design should have been immediately modified (use stronger bolts, locking nuts, improved washers or retention clips, etc.). Quality control checks in the factory could have caught assembly mistakes like under-tightening. In short, by engineering for sturdiness and performing real-world simulation tests, the company would have identified the weak point and fixed it long before shipping any units. This recall illustrates a preventable oversight in basic product robustness.
Consumer Action: Stop children from using these scooters right away. Even if your unit hasn’t failed yet, the risk is significant enough that it’s not worth letting kids continue to ride them. Konges Sløjd is offering a full refund to customers; owners should contact the company or the retailer for instructions (typically, you might have to send a photo of the scooter with a cut in the rubber grip or otherwise prove destruction to get your refund). Do not attempt to repair the scooter yourself, as the safety issue is fundamental. If your child was injured in a scooter incident, be sure to document the injury and consider reaching out for legal advice, as you may have a basis for a product liability claim.
“Criblike” Aftermarket Mattresses (Infant Suffocation & Entrapment Hazard):
What Happened: Mengna (Zhujisibeixu Information Services) recalled about 117,900 “Criblike” infant mattresses sold as aftermarket pads for play yards (pack-n-plays) and mini-cribs. These mattresses do not meet the federal safety standard for infant mattresses. Specifically, some models were too small or thin for the intended sleep space, potentially leaving dangerous gaps between the mattress and the sides of the play yard or crib. Infants can suffocate if they roll into such a gap and get trapped between the mattress and the mesh or slats. Additionally, one model failed the mattress flammability standard (posing a fire risk). No injuries were reported, but the CPSC flagged the serious risk of suffocation or entrapment as the reason for the recall.
What Should Have Been Done: The company should have ensured these mattresses were precisely designed to meet safety standards and fit correctly. To prevent these issues, the manufacturer needed to follow the mandatory crib mattress standard, which includes specifications for dimensions and firmness. Before marketing them, they should have test-fitted each “Criblike” mattress in the common play yards and mini-cribs to ensure a snug, gap-free fit. If any gaps were detected, the product should not have been sold. Also, using proper high-density foam or padding would ensure the mattress isn’t overly compressible or thin, which can create space at the sides. Regarding flammability, the materials should have been treated or chosen to comply with the 16 CFR 1632/1633 standards. In summary, basic compliance and product testing (size, firmness, and fire safety) would have prevented this recall. The very purpose of an aftermarket mattress is to be a safe replacement – there is no excuse for selling one that doesn’t fit properly or violates safety rules.
Consumer Action: Stop using any “Criblike” mattress immediately. If you have been using one in a play yard or mini-crib, remove it and put it out of reach of infants. Mengna is offering a full refund. The recall instructions typically tell consumers to destroy the mattress (for example, cut it in half) and send a photo as proof of destruction to the company in order to get the refund. Follow those instructions by emailing the manufacturer (or contacting via Amazon if that’s where you bought it). In the meantime, use the original mattress pad that came with your play yard or find a fully compliant replacement from a reputable brand. Never continue to use a mattress that doesn’t fit tightly—infant sleep products must fit correctly with no gaps.
Harppa 5-in-1 High Chairs (Fall and Entrapment Hazards):
What Happened: Harppa (Shanghai Yizhen Wenhua Yishu) recalled about 4,300 five-in-one convertible high chairs for babies and toddlers because they violate the federal high chair safety standard in two critical ways. First, the high chairs were sold without a permanent restraint harness attached – meaning there was no built-in safety belt to secure the child. This omission poses a serious fall risk (a child can climb or lean out and fall to the floor). Second, there was a gap between the seat and the tray large enough for an infant’s or toddler’s head to get stuck, posing an entrapment and strangulation hazard. Despite these dangers, no incidents or injuries had been reported prior to the recall. The affected high chairs (model BHC001) were sold online (e.g., Walmart.com) in 2024–2025.
What Should Have Been Done: Harppa should have designed the product in full compliance with ASTM/CPSC high chair standards from the outset. Key requirements are: (1) a secure, permanently-attached harness system (typically a 5-point harness) to keep the child in place, and (2) no dangerous head entrapment openings. To prevent these issues, the manufacturer needed to include a proper buckle and strap system fixed to the chair. It’s puzzling that any high chair would be sold without a harness – that’s a fundamental feature. As for the tray gap, the design should have been tested with probes or test dolls to ensure that an infant’s head or torso cannot pass through any opening. Harppa should have also consulted the standard which specifies acceptable dimensions and the presence of a passive crotch restraint to prevent slipping down. If they had done thorough safety testing and design reviews, they would have caught the missing harness and large gap before production. In essence, better oversight and adherence to the established safety regulations would have stopped this unsafe high chair from ever reaching consumers.
Consumer Action: Do not use this high chair at all. If you have one, even if you think you can rig a belt or watch your child closely, it’s not worth the risk – the product has multiple design flaws. Harppa is providing customers with a free replacement high chair that meets safety standards. Owners are instructed (per the recall) to stop using the chair, email the company with proof of purchase, and they will receive a new, safer chair. The company also asks consumers to destroy the recalled chair (for instance, cut the straps and seat cover, and disassemble it) and send photos as proof. If you own this chair, follow those steps. In the interim, use a different safe high chair for your child’s feedings. Never leave a child unattended in any high chair, and if you notice a missing harness or large gaps in any baby product, stop using it and contact the seller or manufacturer.
What to Do If You’re Injured by a Defective Product
Product recalls aim to get dangerous items off the market before they cause harm. However, injuries from defective products do happen. If you or someone you love is injured by a faulty product, take these steps to protect your health and legal rights:
Seek Medical Attention Immediately. Your well-being comes first. If the injury is serious, call 911 or see a doctor right away. Make sure to tell the medical providers what product was involved so they document it. Medical records linking the injury to the product are important evidence if you pursue a claim later.
Preserve the Product and Any Pieces. Keep the product that caused the injury, even if it’s broken – do not try to fix it or throw it away. If parts broke off (for example, a wheel that came off a scooter or a piece of a toy that snapped), save all the pieces. Also hang onto any packaging, instructions, or receipts. These items can serve as evidence to show what model you had, how it was supposed to be used, and how it failed. Store everything safely where it won’t be further damaged.
Document the Incident and Injury. Write down the details of what happened as soon as you can: the date, time, and circumstances of the incident, and the sequence of events. Take photos or video of the scene, the product (especially the defect or broken area), and your injuries (bruises, cuts, etc.). If there were witnesses, get their names and contact info and ask them to describe what they saw. This documentation will be extremely helpful later on to establish the facts of the case.
Check for Recalls or Safety Warnings. Look up the product on the CPSC’s website (cpsc.gov) to see if it has been recalled or has safety alerts. You can search by product name or model. If you find a recall, follow the guidance (stop using it, etc.) and note the recall details (date, hazard, etc.). Even if it’s not recalled yet, you can report the incident to CPSC at saferproducts.gov. Your report can alert regulators to the danger – which might lead to an official recall to prevent others from being hurt. Print or save copies of any recall notice or safety communications related to the product.
Consult an Experienced Product Liability Lawyer. Consider reaching out to a lawyer who handles defective product cases – like a product liability attorney – sooner rather than later. These cases can be complex, and companies often have legal teams ready to defend themselves. A lawyer can advise you on whether you have a valid claim, how to preserve evidence (they may even arrange an expert inspection of the product), and what kind of compensation you might be entitled to (medical bills, lost income, pain and suffering, etc.). Many product liability lawyers (including Langino Law) offer a free initial consultation, so it won’t cost you anything to get an opinion. Having an attorney also means you have someone to advocate for you and handle communications with the manufacturer or insurance, which can be a huge relief while you’re recovering from an injury.
Following these steps can protect your rights and put you in the best position if you decide to pursue a legal claim. Importantly, by speaking up and holding companies accountable, you may also help prevent the same thing from happening to someone else.
Why Langino Law Is a Strong Choice for Product Liability Claims
If you’ve been hurt by a defective product, choosing the right attorney can make all the difference. Here’s why Langino Law – led by attorney Adam Langino – stands out:
Deep Experience in Product Liability: Product injury cases are a focus of our practice. Adam Langino has over a decade of experience representing people harmed by dangerous products. He has worked on a wide variety of product liability cases, from faulty medical devices to unsafe children’s toys. Earlier in his career, Adam spent years at a prominent national law firm handling complex injury and wrongful death cases involving corporate negligence. He has also taken on leadership roles in this field – for example, serving as Chair of the Products Liability sections of both the North Carolina Advocates for Justice and the American Association for Justice (the leading national trial lawyers’ organization). He’s even written articles and given talks to other lawyers about consumer product safety litigation. This background means that when you hire Langino Law, you get an attorney who knows the tactics big companies use and how to build a strong case to hold them accountable.
Track Record of Accountability and Results: Adam’s work has helped clients recover over $50 million in verdicts and settlements over his career. More importantly, he has a proven track record of taking on large companies and making sure they take responsibility for the harm they caused. In private practice, he has gone up against major corporations (including product manufacturers and insurance companies) and secured compensation for injured consumers. We prepare every case thoroughly, often working with top-notch experts – such as engineers, safety consultants, or medical specialists – to prove exactly how a product was defective and the impact of the injury. Our philosophy is simple: we can’t undo the injury, but we can demand accountability through the legal system and seek fair compensation to help our clients rebuild their lives. The substantial recoveries and positive outcomes we’ve achieved reflect that commitment.
Local Presence in Chapel Hill, Statewide Reach: Langino Law is based in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, and we are proud to serve our local community. Adam Langino and his family moved to Chapel Hill in 2018, and they’re actively involved in the community. We understand the values and concerns of families here in the Triangle. When you become our client, you’re not just a case number – you’re a neighbor. At the same time, we handle cases across the state of North Carolina and even coordinate on national cases. Whether your defective product injury happened in Chapel Hill, Durham, Charlotte, or a small town in Eastern NC, we have the flexibility to work with you. We’re familiar with courts statewide, and if your case involves a product sold nationally, we can collaborate with co-counsel in other states as needed. You get the benefit of a hometown firm with broader connections and resources. We make it a point to be accessible – we can meet in person, over video, or travel to you if necessary.
Client-Focused, Compassionate Representation: Suffering an injury or seeing your child hurt by an unsafe product is frightening and stressful. We understand that, and we take a compassionate approach with our clients. When you contact Langino Law, you’ll speak directly with Adam Langino – the attorney who will actually handle your case – not an assistant or call center. We listen to your story, answer your questions, and explain things in plain language. Throughout the case, we keep you updated and involved in key decisions. We also work on a contingency fee basis, which means you pay nothing upfront and no fee at all unless we win compensation for you. This arrangement allows everyone to afford high-quality legal help, and it aligns our success with yours. Our goal is not only to win your case, but to make the process as smooth as possible for you. We handle the legal battles so you can focus on healing. Clients often tell us they appreciate our personal touch and the genuine care we show for their well-being.
In summary, Langino Law has the experience, skill, and dedication to take on tough product liability cases – and we do it while providing the kind of personal, attentive service that larger firms often can’t match. We combine big-firm results with small-firm care.
Committed to Chapel Hill and North Carolina
At Langino Law, we don’t just work in Chapel Hill – we live here. This is our home. Chapel Hill is a vibrant community, known for its education, innovation, and close-knit feel. We love the fact that it’s a place where neighbors look out for each other. That community spirit inspires our practice. When a dangerous product causes injury to someone here, it’s affecting our community’s safety. We take that personally. It motivates us to work even harder to hold wrongdoers accountable, because we know we’re protecting our friends and neighbors.
We’re also aware that defective products can impact families anywhere. North Carolina spans from the mountains to the coast, and whether you’re in a big city or rural area, you deserve protection from unsafe products. That’s why we’re committed to serving clients all across North Carolina. Over the years, we’ve handled cases involving residents of many different NC counties. We make use of technology to communicate and handle paperwork remotely when distance is an issue, and we’re willing to travel as needed to ensure our clients have strong representation. In essence, when you hire Langino Law, you get the best of both worlds: a local Chapel Hill advocate who knows your community, and an experienced lawyer who can navigate any courtroom or opponent in North Carolina and beyond.
Ultimately, our commitment is to the people of our state. We want North Carolina to be a safe place for consumers. By holding companies accountable when they put dangerous products on the market, we aim to encourage higher safety standards and prevent future injuries. It’s our way of giving back to the community that has given us so much.
Conclusion: Accountability, Community, and Your Next Steps
Recent recalls like those described above serve as a stark reminder that companies must prioritize consumer safety. When they don’t, people can get hurt – and that’s when holding them accountable becomes critical. Langino Law is dedicated to doing just that. We combine legal experience with a genuine care for our clients and our community. We won’t use flashy slogans or make empty promises; instead, we will work hard on your behalf to pursue accountability and a fair outcome.
If you or a loved one has been injured by a defective product, take action today to protect your rights. Langino Law is here to help. We offer free consultations to evaluate your case and answer your questions, with no obligation. You’ll speak directly with an attorney who understands product liability law and the challenges you’re facing.
Don’t shoulder the consequences of a company’s negligence on your own. Let us help you seek the accountability (and compensation) you deserve, so you can focus on healing and moving forward. We’re ready to stand by your side and guide you through the process.
Call to Action: If you’ve been hurt by a dangerous or defective product, contact Langino Law today for a free case evaluation. Call us at (888) 254-3521 or visit our website at LanginoLaw.com. Based in Chapel Hill and serving clients across North Carolina, we are ready to put our experience to work for you.
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. “Inkari Plush Alpaca Toys Recalled Due to Risk of Serious Injury or Death from Choking Hazard; Violate Small Parts Ban; Imported by Inkari.” CPSC, 6 Nov. 2025, www.cpsc.gov/Recalls/2026/Inkari-Plush-Alpaca-Toys-Recalled-Due-to-Risk-of-Serious-Injury-or-Death-from-Choking-Hazard-Violate-Small-Parts-Ban-Imported-by-Inkari.
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. “Sanven Technology Recalls Vevor Baby Swings Due to Risk of Serious Injury from Suffocation Hazard; Violates Mandatory Standard for Infant Sleep Products and Inclined Sleepers Ban.” CPSC, 6 Nov. 2025, www.cpsc.gov/Recalls/2026/Sanven-Technology-Recalls-Vevor-Baby-Swings-Due-to-Risk-of-Serious-Injury-from-Suffocation-Hazard-Violates-Mandatory-Standard-for-Infant-Sleep-Products-and-Inclined-Sleepers-Ban.
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. “WYBITNY Bed Rails Recalled Due to Risk of Serious Injury or Death from Entrapment; Violates Mandatory Standard for Children’s Portable Bed Rails; Sold on Amazon by WYBITNY.” CPSC, 6 Nov. 2025, www.cpsc.gov/Recalls/2026/WYBITNY-Bed-Rails-Recalled-Due-to-Risk-of-Serious-Injury-or-Death-from-Entrapment-Violates-Mandatory-Standard-for-Childrens-Portable-Bed-Rails-Sold-on-Amazon-by-WYBITNY.
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. “Umeyda Nightgowns Recalled Due to Risk of Serious Injury or Death from Burns; Violate Mandatory Standards for Children’s Sleepwear; Sold on Amazon by Umeyda Company.” CPSC, 2 Nov. 2025, www.cpsc.gov/Recalls/2026/Umeyda-Nightgowns-Recalled-Due-to-Risk-of-Serious-Injury-or-Death-from-Burns-Violate-Mandatory-Standards-for-Childrens-Sleepwear-Sold-on-Amazon-by-Umeyda-Company.
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. “Napei Infant Bath Tubs Recalled Due to Risk of Serious Injury or Death from Ingestion Hazard; Violates Mandatory Standard for Consumer Products with Button Cell Batteries; Sold on Amazon by Sefon Store.” CPSC, 2 Nov. 2025, www.cpsc.gov/Recalls/2026/Napei-Infant-Bath-Tubs-Recalled-Due-to-Risk-of-Serious-Injury-or-Death-from-Ingestion-Hazard-Violates-Mandatory-Standard-for-Consumer-Products-with-Button-Cell-Batteries-Sold-on-Amazon-by-Sefon-Store.
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. “Three-Wheeled Children’s Scooters Recalled Due to Fall Hazard; Imported by Konges Sløjd.” CPSC, 9 Nov. 2025, www.cpsc.gov/Recalls/2026/Three-Wheeled-Childrens-Scooters-Recalled-Due-to-Fall-Hazard-Imported-by-Konges-Sl%C3%B8jd.
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. “Criblike Mattresses Recalled Due to Risk of Serious Injury or Death from Entrapment or Suffocation; Violates Mandatory Standards for Mattresses; Sold on Amazon by Mengna.” CPSC, 6 Nov. 2025, www.cpsc.gov/Recalls/2026/Criblike-Mattresses-Recalled-Due-to-Risk-of-Serious-Injury-or-Death-from-Entrapment-or-Suffocation-Violates-Mandatory-Standards-for-Mattresses-Sold-on-Amazon-by-Mengna.
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. “5-in-1 Convertible High Chairs Recalled Due to Risk of Serious Injury or Death from Fall and Entrapment Hazards; Violates Mandatory Standard for High Chairs; Imported by Harppa.” CPSC, 30 Oct. 2025, www.cpsc.gov/Recalls/2026/5-in-1-Convertible-High-Chairs-Recalled-Due-to-Risk-of-Serious-Injury-or-Death-from-Fall-and-Entrapment-Hazards-Violates-Mandatory-Standard-for-HighChairs-Imported-by-Harppa.
“About Adam Langino.” Langino Law, www.langinolaw.com/about/. Accessed 12 Nov. 2025.